The Universe is like Earth, with many places waiting to be explored and inhabited. As a dream from very young, The 5th Human plans to leave earth via a self designed means of physical travel and transportation. It will not operate like the traditional rocket methods. The current means of the vehicle has not even been thought of as of yet but is a plan for the far future. His goal is to help the world as much as he can and return to the stars creating of his own as well as exploring the other realities and universes.
Plan for Leaving Earth
February 24th, 2010Instantly Knowing Who is Closer to the Truth Without Debates. Who do we Listen to?
February 2nd, 2010In our world there still exists debates that exists all the way from the realm of religion to realm of science and politics. People debate saying “I am right and you are wrong”. People have specific beliefs that in most cases go unchanged unless it is confirmed absolutely. The purpose of this message is to know who might be right or wrong beforehand.
It is argued that all things are relative. While this is true to a degree, predictive speculation to a given conditional knowledge is either right or wrong and can be proven or disproved by the individual when the time comes. What is Predictive Conditional Knowledge? Conditional Knowledge is that “if this happens, then this will result.” Or it is that “if we go here, this is what we will see”. This is different from knowledge that is merely opinions and cannot be tested by the individual person.
For example, lets say if we had a cup of water and pour it into a fire, what would happen? Those that have already experienced or seen the event would more likely be correct in guessing the repeatable result. But those that have never experiment with such an idea before will be forced to guess or infer what might happen and then see if they are right later.
Therefore, lets say there are 3 cave men who have never done such an experiment before. They are asked to give their opinions of what would be the conditional knowledge of what would happen when you pour water on fire. The fire and its intensity is right there in their environment and they have a bowl of water in their hand.
The first cave man might say that the water will turn into more fire once it is poured on it.
The second cave man might say that the water will turn dirt.
The third cave man might say that the water will turn into air.
But the important thing is that each person will have an image in their mind on what they believe might happen that varies in clearness and/or accuracy and of course none of them might be right (in this case we would have to keep asking other cavemen until we find those capable of understanding, if ever, or it least if anyone is capable of being the closest).
In either case, there will be individuals that will be closest to the truth (to the predictability of a given conditional knowledge), while there will be others that are furthest from the truth. There will also be those that simply have no clue or simply guess with no form of reasoning or correct foundation.
Therefore, after each person is given their opinion, what they do is perform the experiment to see whose predictions of the conditional knowledge was correct, or closest to the truth.
It will be obvious the caveman 3 would be closest to the truth, perhaps even surprising himself of how well the image in his mind match the future reality, while the others would clearly see their mental images did not match at all.
This has happened many many times in the past. In fact, it happens all the time and is happening today. There are people that say and believe one thing about the future or past, or the way things should be or designed, while there are others who say the opposite and one is proven right and the other wrong. We cannot deny that this happens.
In the case of history, many people believed that if you got on a ship and kept going you would fall off the edge like falling off the edge of the table. But when undergoing the experiment themselves, they find out that their speculations weren’t as correct as they thought and those that said that would not happen were correct.
The bottom line is that there is a difference between those people that were right versus those people that were wrong. There has to be some difference and it is this difference that will be the key to knowing who will more likely be closer to the truth and who will more likely speaking from blindness leading the world astray.
When it comes to conditional knowledge in our present moment, if we ask all 7 billion people on the planet, “What would happen if we were able to see the past during the time when humans or life first appeared on earth? What would we see?”
Just like the cave men with the water, there will be as many different answers as there are people. In the end, when the experiment is finally able to take place, there will be those that will be closest to the truth, there will be those that are in between, and there will be those that are furthest away.
As mentioned before, the purpose of this article is to end all debates and to know who is more likely to be right and who is more likely to be wrong, without going through the long process of argument, deception, emotional statements and yelling, confusion, or waiting years to know what side to take after mistakes are already made. If we can understand the difference between those that are proven right and those that are proven wrong, then we can make progress toward that direction.
So lets get to the key. What is that difference? What is the difference between confirmed right and wrong people in the past? It seems it would be the level of awareness of the individuals. It seems it would be their level of comprehension and understanding of the world. It being the number and accuracy of connections in their brain and confirmed knowledge. It being their level of intelligence and cognition that allows them to be correct in their predictions and efficiency in their designs, as opposed to those that predict and have opinions toward specific things, leading the world astray.
Despite how intelligent one might think they are, every person at a given time thinks they are right and is usually incapable of seeing the level of comprehension of those that are above them. This is why debates never end with the mind of humans but only when there is outside scientific confirmation (and even in those cases sometimes because of the ego of humans its still does not end the debate). This is why a person thinks the other person is speaking nonsense, when he himself may be wrong because he is incapable of comprehending, or the person himself may be right and the other wrong. But in the end, there exists the possibility of one of those individuals being proven right or at least purposely closer to the truth.
The difference between Copernicus and the rest of the world during his time was that his brain was able to piece together things those that thought he was crazy could not. Albert Einstein was able to see that if you go on a ship at near light speeds time for that person would change and move slower. If you ask others to predict what would happen during that time before relativity was published, they would be wrong.
In our current would, the unknown is debated all the time. And as the past has proven, it turns out that someone proves themselves wrong and others prove themselves right. The difference between them is their brains and ability to analyze and process information accurately and broadly to not miss anything. Therefore, when it comes to debates, by simply observing the brains of the individuals, those that can see connections to a greater number of things than the other, and have more scientific knowledge to work with, we can conclude is closer to the truth than the other who is making conclusions with much less comparative understanding or facts.
The difference between some people being right, while others being wrong is their comprehensibility and understanding of reality. If we can measure this in individuals, we as a human species will proceed closer to the truth much faster. This in fact would be a survival mechanism and prevent our species from making mistakes or going down the wrong paths by listening to the wrong people.
Another way to know who has a more clear perspective of the truth is that those that see more can normally understand from the other person claiming him/her to be wrong’s perspective. This is because he/she has been there before but has progress beyond that level of complexity while the other is simply incapable of understanding what the other person is talking about until he/she, if ever, reaches that level of comprehensible complexity.
But in the case of measuring, of course, this will not be something that is to be believed first hand. It must be proven. Will it be proven to be repeatable? Will we be able to look at two people forming an opinion about something and say “Evidence shows that this person is more likely to be right.” I believe so. Scientist can now look at fingers of athletes to determine those that would be most athletic, it wouldn’t be before too long when they’ll be able to do it cognitively.
Individuals can be asked to perform specific cognitive tests and how it relates to the real world and compare the results. The common sense of individuals can be measured by psychologists, neurologist, mris, etc. by seeing the neurological or mental difference in those that were more correct and efficient in applying their mental reasoning to the real world vs those who were not. Once the scientists identify the differences or causes in the variability in the complexity, correctness, and commonsense, they would be able to know those that have a better cognitive ability to foresee, think rationality, or more importantly be right. And this does not only apply to understanding, but in creating and design things like building houses, societies, etc.
The differences exist, we just have to understand why some are right and some are wrong, which happens all the time.
Psychic Fingerprinting and Memory Scanning: Evidence Better than DNA Evidence and Finger Imprinting
January 31st, 2010Psychic Fingerprinting will be based on the knowledge that just as individuals have their own genetic structure and pattern finger imprint of the hand, so also all individuals have a unique psychological imprint that leaves imprints or memory markers in the environment.
Despite what is believed we are more than just chemicals. In fact, chemicals and energy are one. Thus chemicals are a form of energy. But we also have other forms of energy that are a part of us which can be used as a form of “identification” which is unique to each person, just like the pattern of our known physical body, and which is connected to our own body and DNA.
In additional to our known chemical body, we each have an emotional and mental body (and even body levels beyond those we are not aware of) connect to each one of our cells. In most cases the chemical body usually only covers the area of space of the person’s visual body, but the emotional or mental body of the person is capable of being known much further away because it is more wavelike.
Just as the chemical body can move and adjust and go places, so also the emotional and mental body and they all are connected. This is how we change and get unhappy or sad toward specific things. It is how we think or have opinions about various different things. These are choices and adjustments just as with the human body and they affect specific places and can be tracked just as with specific places.
In traditional crime scenes, particularly forensic science is used to identify the shedding of materials and chemicals of an individuals chemical body, or impressions of things on chemical objects such as finger or shoe imprints. While these methods work, it is still limiting and does not include all of the evidence that is available, if the more common form of evidence is missing.
In the future, what will become available is Psychic Fingerprinting and Profiling, or other names it might be called is Mental Fingerprinting, Emotional Fingerprinting, Psychological Fingerprinting, Aura Fingerprinting, Chakra Fingerprinting, Telepathy Fingerprinting or Profiling, or whatever else it might be called. But in other words it will be able to sense and notice the mental and emotional impressions and wave patterns that is left in the emotional and mental aspects of the environment or person’s involved in the crimes – and even those that knew about the crime before or during the time it has taken place.
Just as each person has a unique chemical body that interacts with the chemical environment, leaving pattern impressions, so also each person’s emotional and mental body interacts with the environment and leaves impressions of memory that still exists in that atmospheric reality. Each person’s presence interacts with the environment differently, leaving clues as to the kind of pattern that resulted from the interaction.
The Universe is more than just chemical. Our houses are more than just chemical and even our bodies. Thus, when we begin to understand the emotional or mental nature of reality, in the same way we have with chemicals, then we will understand that all things have emotional and mental memory, just like ourselves.
Every thought a person thinks is stored as a memory impression at the location of wherever the person thought. Therefore, in the case of crime scenes if forensic scientists cannot find any DNA evidence or other forms of physical evidence, with the new science of perception, psi researchers will be able to look into the fabric of the space-time and notice memory markers of a person’s emotional or mental energy patterns.
This is infact how many psychics are able to sense impressions from the past when going to specific crimes scenes or just by seeing a picture. This is because the mental energy makes a lasting impression, just like physical impressions to infer, that psychics are able to pick up, which exists behind the veil of known physical light and chemicals.
Whatever a persons emotional energy touches to another emotional energy or a persons mental energy touches to another mental energy, that memory is stored and can be harnessed by scientists to infer all whose mental or emotional energy were at that location to specific times in the past.
If a person walks down a hallway in a building, but leaves no signs of physical impressions on the floor or in the air, or leaves no signs of molecular evidence, scientists will be able to look into the aura and mental universe of that environment and sense who has been there that way.
All things are conscious and the memory of who was there, whether it was a specific emotional or mental energy, is stored in that environment just as a person sheds their physical skin or hair and leaves evidence on the chemical environment.
Since each person has their own personality that personality has its own energetic pattern.
Once we learn how to read Auras and Thoughts with devices, in the same way we have learned to read radio-waves, x-rays, etc., we can apply that to a machine that is able to sense or infer information from past.
The device will not only be able to see Light from the past, but will be able to read specific Auras, Thoughts, and Memories from the past that is unique to each person.
Therefore, those individuals that think they have committed crimes in secret will be exposed because we can see from where their emotional and mental energy came from and went from anywhere in the past and the thoughts they thought – just as we can see from where the arms or legs of individuals went or has done in the past.
Thoughts are a form of energy and also leave imprints in the environment of where the person is and where the person is thinking.
Universal Memory Reading Network
However, despite the means of Psychic FingerImprinting the other way crimes will be analyzed beyond DNA evidence is by machines and computers that can read the thoughts of humans. Depsite what many believe, mind reading devices is going to be a reality in the future. Inside everyone’s mind are memories, whether they remember them or not. Every thought a person thinks, every dream a person dreams, every place a person goes, is stored as memory in the mind and body of the person whether they remember it or not. This memory can be recalled and read by advanced computers by analyzing information and/or sensing frequencies of energy that is responsible for the sensing of such information.
Therefore, any crimes that a person has committed in the past, can be analyzed and noticed by the Computer by creating and noticing those memories that contain the emotional frequencies, intents, or images that is normally involved with committing or hiding a crime. The computer will also scan for all the terrible experiences one has undergone in his or her lifetime and compare it to the memories those have of committing crimes to see if they relate to the person’s experiences. It can then replay the time memory and process the person has undergone during the process of committing a crime and physical evidence can be observed if such things have really happened in the past to specific locations in mental, emotional, or physical reality.
In addition, all people, but minimizing it from the individuals that have good track records, can be required to undergo psychological scans by this computer mind memory reading device which can be connected to a global or society internet or network.
Therefore, when such things as hacking, stealing, murder, harassing, fraud, or any other things with the intent to interfere with another’s freedom to be happy, healthy, and prosperous the computer will be able to notice those memory markers and compare it to whatever things that has already happened frequently or in the past. Those that would be reluctant to use the device would more likely be evidence that they are hiding something and have commit crimes he/she doesn’t want others to know.
Coverups and False Information
Many times crimes are committed but have a means of “cover up” as something else is the cause of the crime. This system will be able to sense well beyond that. All individuals have memories of all the things they have done, whether good or bad. Thus when the system picks up information about the negative things that a person has purposely done, and then finds that the event was diagnosed as something different, it will be able to examine the real cause of it. Thus, all cover ups will be exposed in the future.
The Chain of Knowing
The final aspect of this system will be the chain of knowing. One of the most fundamental ways to know all those that were involved in committing a crime is if they knew about it before it has taken place, in which the network scan will be able to pick up. Those that knew about the crime more than likely would have tried to prevent it or by exposing it to the police, but those that knew and did nothing are more than likely the suspects or those that were involved in it being committed. Even if a person may not have committed a crime, the scanner will still be able to pick up if the person knew about it before it happened and get information on how and why the person knew to perform a full analysis.
And just like individuals have memories of the places they visited and the things they have done, so also individuals have memories of each other. Thus if one individual is marked about knowing about a crime before it has taken place their accomplices will be in the memory as well and thus help expose the possibly of all that were involved.
No crime will go unsolved. Likewise no crime should have gone unprevented and more importantly no crime should have even taken place to begin with. But the reality is that crimes happen all the time on earth, many in “secret” and many “unsolved” but there comes an end to that. All crimes will be tracked to their corresponding origins will be the future.
Mental evidence will either replace or be an addition to the traditional chemical and physical based evidence and observations. There is a whole another universe besides what we see as chemical objects that devices will be able to detect and infer as unique patterns of information.
There are no such things as secrets. All things will be brought to light because in essence, all things are like light.